Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Strict implication: Strict implication in logic is a type of implication that is stronger than the standard material implication. A ⇒ B means that it is impossible for A to be true and B to be false. See also Implication Paradox, Implication._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maxwell J. Cresswell on Implication, strict - Dictionary of Arguments
Hughes I 191 Strict implication/Cl. I. Lewis: p strImp q: "p follows from q" - This avoids the paradox of (substantive) implication. - This leads to pairs of statements, none of which implies the other. >Implication, >Paradox of implication, >Paradoxes._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Cr I M. J. Cresswell Semantical Essays (Possible worlds and their rivals) Dordrecht Boston 1988 Cr II M. J. Cresswell Structured Meanings Cambridge Mass. 1984 Hughes I G.E. Hughes Maxwell J. Cresswell Einführung in die Modallogik Berlin New York 1978 |
||
> Counter arguments against Cresswell
> Counter arguments in relation to Implication, strict
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-27